Supreme court -The judgment of Ram Janm Bhoomi

Ram Janm Bhoomi

Supreme court -The judgment of Ram Janm Bhoomi

The supreme court of India has annoucnced its judgment on Ayodhya dispute , Saturday 9th of November 2019. About 500 year old dispute reached its conclusion after the struggle of 134 years of subjective matter. Headed  By the chief justice of India , Ranjan Gagoi , the constitution bench unanimously accepted the claim of Ramlala virajman over disputed land of 2.77 acre . according to court on the basis of facts including the writing of foreign travelers it is stabilized without doubt that Hindus have always been assuming the Babri masjid ( disputed land ) is very place where located ram got birth .

the court gave the very right to worship ram lala , to mg Gopal Singh Visarad after years of his death . the litigation of Shia waqf board has been rejected on the basis of delay by assign act 142 court ordered to provide five acre land to sunni waqf board at the prominent place in Ayodhya .

court directed the centre government to organize a trust which would manage and construct the temple . court rejected the claim of Nirmohi Akhara as facing sevadar but by using special power directed the government to provide representation of Akhara in to the trust .

Vital point of judgment –

Ram Janm Bhoomi

1-Headed by cji Ranjan Gagoi , five judge bench gave its historic judgment .

2-Whole (2.77 acre ) disputed land to be given to construct the temple .

3-Central government will organize board with the three month.

4-Inner and outer yard of ram janm bhoomi is given to board .

5-Trust or board will have all right related to temple construction .

6-Gopal Visarad found the right of worship after 33  years of his death .

7-Because the mosque existed and unlawfully destroyed on 6 dec1992 , court gave the order by using art.142 to central government . on state government to provide a land of 5 acre prominent place in Ayodhya for the construction of masque .

8-Supreme court rejected the judgment of all high court dividing the disputed land into three part among ‘three confenclers by assuming it as illegal. Supreme court stated that high court judgment of bench neither the fulfill the purpose and intrest of litigents nor gurante the pormonint place and harmony.

9-Ram janam bhoomi is registered as government land revenue record .

Asi report –

Court can not overlook or ignore the findings of archeological survey of India which stated that beneath the babri mosque .the structure was unislamic . asi finds relics might be the temple of 12th century .

The basic testimonies of the  decision-


Ram Janm Bhoomi

1-There are four prominent evidence and testimony, put forwarded by the court .

2-Mosque had not been built on plain land

3-Supreme court assume that judgment of high court of Allahabad was transparent in the sense that it accept that there was a huge structure beneath the mosque . even the mosque was built by using the remains of this unislamic structure .by accepting the findings of asi as evidence court said it considered Asi  can not be overlook .

Before 1856 there is no evidence of offering namaj –

Litigants for mosque could not prove that before 1856 the namaj were being offered in the mosque . but there are clear evidence provided by foreign travelers and British administration etc that devotes used even after 1856 the litigants’ for mosque can not prove excursively the offering of namaj in disputed land .

No contention against the faith of lord ram’s birth place-

None of the contenders opposes the Ayodhya as birth place of lord Rama . existence of ram chabootra , sita rasoi and bhendara endorse the claim of ramlala virajman ‘ right on disputed land .

आप इसे पढ़ना भी पसंद कर सकते हैं:फास्टैग क्या है ? टोल नाको से गुज़रने वाली गाड़ियों को क्यों लेना होगा ?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here